Total Pageviews

Wednesday, September 9, 2026

The day the ice went out.



Grok: “That photo and the lines under it feel like a complete Vermont memory: the quiet of a hard freeze, then the sudden, noisy release when spring finally wins.

Lewis Creek in Charlotte really does this. The stretch near Quinlan Covered Bridge and Spear Street is known for ice jams. Thick sheets pile up at the bend, form a temporary dam, and when they let go the water and ice come out together. Reports from the area describe exactly what you wrote—stacked plates of ice, loud breakup, and flooding that can overtop the road. 

The picture matches that: broken slabs heaved and stacked in the snow, wooden posts still standing, bare trees in the background. It looks like the moment after the creek has already spoken.

The way you set the lines is already close to a finished piece:

Years ago we lived near Lewis Creek in Charlotte, Vermont.

The creek froze solid that year.

Spring brings warmth, rain, sunshine.

The ice goes out, loudly.

Huge stacked sheets of ice

become a dam and flooding can be expected.


Here is a blog-ready version you can paste. The poem is tightened for rhythm and clarity. The history is the documented record for Lewis Creek near Quinlan Covered Bridge and Spear Street in Charlotte.


When the Ice Goes Out on Lewis Creek

Years ago we lived near Lewis Creek

in Charlotte, Vermont.

That year the creek froze solid.

Spring brings warmth, rain, and sun.

The ice goes out — loudly.

Huge stacked sheets of ice

become a dam.

Flooding can be expected.

The photograph shows what that looks like after the sound has already happened: plates of ice heaved and stacked in the snow, fence posts still standing, the woods waiting.

On Lewis Creek this is not rare. The creek bends just upstream of Quinlan Covered Bridge. Ice rides that bend, catches, and piles. Local records and the Army Corps CRREL Ice Jam Database describe the same pattern again and again. 

Landowners near the bridge have said breakup jams come every few years. A nearby journal and photo record list at least these:

•  March 19, 1986

•  late February 1990

•  March 10–11, 1992

•  March 21, 2003

•  January 25, 2010

The 1992 jam is the one in the official database: a 400- to 600-foot jam at the bend. It flooded houses and roads, chewed the bank and Lewis Creek Road, and damaged pavement on Spear Street. The USGS gauge downstream recorded about 2,000 cubic feet per second that day. 

The January 2010 jam happened while engineers were studying the reach. A 10- to 12-inch ice cover had formed during a long freeze from late December into mid-January. The jam sat about 100 feet upstream of the covered bridge. Water and ice overtopped Spear Street by about a foot. That event was used to calibrate flood models for the site. 

The mechanics are simple and loud. Winter builds a solid sheet. Warmth and rain lift the water under it. The sheet breaks into slabs. The slabs travel until they catch at a bend, a bridge, or a pinch in the channel. They stack. The stack becomes a dam. Water rises behind it, then the dam fails, and the creek announces itself.

We heard that announcement years ago. The stacked ice in the picture is what remains after the creek has already spoken.

CRREL treats an ice jam as a stationary pile of ice that restricts flow. The official working definition is “a stationary accumulation of fragmented ice or frazil that restricts flow.” That pile can form in two main seasons, by two different kinds of ice, and then thicken by three mechanical processes. 

Two families of jam

Freeze-up jams form in early to mid-winter while the air is still well below freezing. They are built mostly of frazil—tiny disc-shaped crystals that grow in supercooled, turbulent open water. The crystals clump into slush, then floes. When the floes reach slower water, a solid cover, a bend, or a bridge, they stop. More frazil packs under the cover and can form a hanging dam. These jams are relatively cohesive. They often stay put until the weather warms. Surface roughness is moderate. Discharge is usually steady or falling. 

Breakup jams form when an existing sheet fails. That is what your Lewis Creek picture shows. Warmth, rain, and snowmelt raise the water under the ice. The cover lifts, cracks, and breaks into slabs. Those slabs run downstream until the river can no longer carry them. The jam is made of broken sheet ice, not frazil slush. Cohesion is low. The surface is extremely rough. Flow is unsteady—surges arrive, stages jump, and the jam can fail suddenly and loudly. 

A third, mixed type is the midwinter jam: a thaw breaks part of the cover, then the cold returns and locks the rubble in place.

Lewis Creek at the Quinlan bend is a classic breakup site: a sharp curve, a covered bridge, a pinch in the channel, and an intact sheet just downstream that can act as a stopper.

How the ice itself is born

In open, fast water the surface loses heat faster than the current can mix it. Water drops a fraction of a degree below 32°F. Needle- and disc-shaped crystals appear in the water column—frazil. They stick to each other, to rocks (anchor ice), and to the underside of any cover that already exists. In quieter reaches the surface simply freezes into a sheet that thickens from the top down. Border ice grows inward from the banks. Where velocity stays high (roughly 5 ft/s and up), a cover may never form at all. 

Three ways a jam thickens

CRREL hydraulic papers (especially White’s work on properties that affect jams) describe three construction methods: 

1.  Juxtaposition. Floes arrive and stop side by side, one layer thick, like ice rafts parking against a barrier. Progression can be fast—several miles in a day on larger rivers.

2.  Undercover deposition. Incoming pieces dive under the leading edge and stick to the underside. That builds a hanging dam. It happens when velocity is high enough to submerge floes but not high enough to scour them away. Typical critical erosion speeds used in models are about 3–5 ft/s for freeze-up ice and 4–8 ft/s for breakup ice.

3.  Shoving and internal collapse. Incoming ice keeps pushing. When the force exceeds the internal strength of the pile, the jam fails internally, shortens, and thickens until its strength again balances the push. That is how a single-layer cover becomes a stacked, multi-layer dam—the “huge stacked sheets” in your photograph.

Those three phases often cycle: arrive, deposit, shove, thicken, arrive again.

How breakup actually starts

CRREL and related river-ice work (Ferrick and others) distinguish two end-members: 

•  Thermal breakup. Slow melt. The ice weakens in place (candling), then quietly disappears. Little movement, little jam risk.

•  Dynamic breakup. A rapid rise in stage and discharge. The cover is still strong. It fails at the banks first (support-dominated) or by crushing through its own strength (strength-dominated). A breaking front can travel faster than the water. Behind it the channel is suddenly open; ahead of it rubble piles up. Release of water stored under the ice creates a wave that can trigger the next reach.

A modest stage rise of only a few centimeters per hour can lift and crack a weakened cover without moving it. A sharp rain-on-snow rise can send the whole sheet downstream as a run.

Why certain places catch ice

CRREL site studies keep finding the same geometry: a pool or backwater below a constriction, a sharp bend, a bridge, an island, a sudden flattening of slope, or an intact sheet that has not yet broken. Seventy-nine percent of Vermont jam sites photographed in one CRREL survey had some form of flow control that created a slow pool where a solid cover could form and then block incoming ice. 

Quinlan Bridge plus the bend upstream is that pattern in miniature. Ice arriving from the upper creek meets slower water and a hard edge. Floes stop. The pile grows by juxtaposition, then by shoving. Water backs up. Spear Street overtopps. When the internal strength is finally exceeded, the dam lets go—loudly.

What the models care about

To predict stage and thickness, CRREL models need:

•  ice roughness (underside and surface)

•  porosity of the rubble

•  cohesion (high in freeze-up, near zero in breakup)

•  internal friction angle

•  piece size

•  whether the cover formed by juxtaposition or by collapse

A 10-year ice-jam flood on a reach like Lewis Creek can produce the same water-surface elevation as a much rarer open-water flood, because the ice itself occupies so much of the channel.

That is the mechanics behind the line in your poem: the ice does not merely melt. It breaks, runs, stacks, dams, and then announces the thaw.”

Thanks, Grok 😎


Tuesday, September 8, 2026

My Dream Realized

 One of my Childhood Dreams was to be a newspaper 📰 reporter.

When Elon Musk bought Twitter and freed the bird 🐦 

Now X.

I saw myself as a worldwide reporter.

Grok imagined me.



Monday, September 7, 2026

Gender Bending

 

This image was produced using a.i.

It’s fiction because 

God knows what our true gender is,

He made us.



Sunday, September 6, 2026

Art Destroyed

 


Fine Art destroyed…

https://www.artnews.com/list/art-news/news/art-vandalism-mona-lisa-van-gogh-famous-artworks-1234647552/


Saturday, September 5, 2026

Caturday and Dad’s Birthday 🎁😻

 

Dagen 😻



Dad and his Mom in their home in St. Louis before he

Left home to the South Pacific 

He was born in 1922. Now He’s beyond the material world.



Friday, September 4, 2026

It was a Marvelous Day

 








In my mind I imagined the lighter
Side of Abraham Lincoln and his son,
Robert Todd Lincoln.
Didn’t quite get the historical facts right.
Their ages aren’t correct and yet,
This image, Joyfully playing,
It was the light feeling they share
Before their World 
Came 
Apart.

Thursday, September 3, 2026

Sunday, August 30, 2026

Feel the Bern




We left the land of Bernie when our property taxes 
Rose to over $10,000 a year for
Our 4th Generation farm,
It wasn’t a farm anymore.
Overgrown fields, brokedown buildings,
Our old house, We loved it there.

We suffered mightily when Monkton Vermont 
Put up our farm for a tax auction for
Being 9 months late paying our property taxes.
The auction never happened.
I never want to live where people are so cold that they would take our Home.
Progressive Town Government versus Us.
Yesterday, wondering what I would post for
8/30/26
Watching News on 📺 clips of
“Democratic Socialists”
Senator Bernie Sanders Campaigning for
Fellow Socialists.
Now consider what you could lose.
Rerun of our painful journey…
Socialism is a one way trip to Hell.
Progressivism is the first volley.

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Which 251

There are 251 Towns in Vermont. It has become very clear to me today that it depends on the town you live in, how sensitive the Town Fathers are. My research came from my year long quest for truth about tax lien sales, due process, 5th and 14th amendments & Vermont's mysterious statewide locally administered property tax
My quest has culminated in complete and total surrender.
In doing so I am freeing myself to release publicly correspondence I have had with the mostly male Town fathers. 
But first I want to prime you. If you find this all too tedious, go back to bedazzled.
I found this paper online by a wonderful historian and he explains the property taxation
during the Romans times up to present day. This is a link and I found it helped me understand what they did to us.
http://www.law.indiana.edu/ilj/volumes/v75/no3/alexander.pdf
Fair warning to Vermont property owners:
You may be living in a town, where in as little as 6 months late paying your property taxes, the town can sell the tax lien, and your bank could pay the tax lien and foreclose. You will be subjected to paying the town's lawyer fees to take your property, and advertising, fees, penalties and up to 8%  of the tax goes to the tax collector.
The town does not use income sensitivity and can pick and choose what to sell.
The article above does talk about due process and the fact that people can challenge
local towns when due process and fairness are not followed.
But the reality, girl, is that the town does not have to tell you. Your name is second on the deed, right?
The town does not have to give you due process.
So I decided to avoid paying the limitless costs of court battle.
It would be the only way to challenge the final decision by the town fathers.
There is no board or centralized State office who hears appeals about town fathers.
The citizen must file suit. With an attorney, that costs 10k and up. Without an attorney,
doom. Either way a potential to aggravate my MS. 
Town wins. Girl loses.
Now I will post over the next span of time, an argument that did not work in this town.
In fact it is weird that the town felt such hardship in 2009, that they would have to sell our fourth generation farm after being 9 months late. This action forced us to suffer irreversibly, completely.
A violation of our trust that people can be kinder than necessary when they see someone suffering.
The article above points to "Tax Farmers" of Roman times. I can envision them raking someone for money.
Also he describes the "Tax Ferrets" of the nineteenth century and the tax collection policies of the 1930 depression.
So if you opt to read the documents I will publish, you may formulate your own opinions.

This is the letter we sent to the town. I edited out some of it but kept the core.
The following is our argument outline of why we believe we should be granted tax abatement.


This explains what we want abated. It states the core of our argument. After the outline will appear comments we believe have merit.
1. Request for Abatement of all Property taxes we paid to the town of Monkton in the year 2009 and also any Fees, Penalties, Interest, town lawyer’s costs and costs we incurred related to Monkton tax including but not limited to:
a. Delinquent 2008 VT & Local Property Taxes, interest, fees, etc: $8,473.68 which was paid after town threatened sale.

b. VT & Local Property Taxes 2009: $4121.83

c. Total of $ 12,595.51.


our property taxes owed in 2009 was 28 percent of our household income.

We understand there is income sensitivity with VT property taxes.



We have faced extraordinary circumstances that make it difficult for us to meet our tax obligations.

Mary was never notified by the tax collector of her being delinquent, nor of her being threatened by a tax sale. Mary wrote the town lawyer and the Monkton select board to get information about what would have been sold and ask how the town attempted to inform her about the tax sale, copy of the ad that Fred and Mary paid for but never saw.

She has not received any of this information.

We have a history of paying our taxes on time and regularly since 

becoming owners in 1993.

The farm has been in this family paying taxes in Monkton for over a hundred years.

We have suffered losses, extraordinary challenges, costs, health issues and stress.

Please consider our requests.



Additional comments which we believe are necessary to express:

We feel that we were subjected to a tax sale in a discriminatory way. 

We were singled out and treated differently from almost every other tax payer who has been in our position of delinquency of less than 1 year.

One selectman said the town attorney decided which properties would be sold based on value. This is contrary to the policy which states any property owing $250 or greater. There are concerning notations in the select board minutes leading up to the sale like one asking how many delinquent properties have mortgages? Why is that relevant? 

The timeline for the Monkton town officials participating and conducting the tax sale, and events leading up to the tax sale are suspicious. Per the minutes, The Conservation committee discussed tax sales in July with a selectman.

John Phillips did send Mary the list of delinquent properties and the policy. 

It was impossible to figure out why there was 58 properties late and only 4 were to be sold. It is unclear in the minutes if any property was sold. It is unclear when tax sales have been held since the new tax sale policy in 2004. There have been many properties listed for multiple years late. How can that be if we were 9 months late and threatened with a tax sale?

What was offered in the way of making payments? Offer of abatement per Vermont law? Ultimately, What was the Town of Monkton going to sell? 

Comments from Mary alone: I am a landowner and successful taxpayer on this farm since 1993 or so. I have paid my dues so to speak. I have been verbally attacked in the town office by a town official. I do not feel comfortable there. Some will say it was Fred’s responsibility to tell me the Town was selling my property so the bank would foreclose and then they could be rid of me. I thought that too for a minute. That is all. 

I deserved to be notified myself, Me, Mary Gerdt, by the Town of Monkton tax collector who decided along with a select board and a lawyer to take my property. The responsibility to notify a landowner must rest with the town.

This relates to the law of real property.

I know the law of land ownership quite well and I know a signature is required from me to take my property and sell it. Even if I am a woman, a wife. No town official approached me or had a sheriff serve me or nail a note on my door. The conservation committee knew about the sale and yet Mary did not know about the sale. This coincided with land deals on abutting property that we both were not notified about. Mary read the minutes but could not tell that her property was up for sale.

It did not make sense. Mary did a spreadsheet of all the properties sold. It does not make sense. Mary has emails to and from the select board and town attorney. Mary still has not seen an accounting of what the tax collector did to notify her/them. 

So we both write to the Monkton Board of Civil Authority with pleading for tax abatement and hopefully leaving you with questions to ponder. 

We believe the tax sale policy should be revisited to include income sensitivity, consideration of hardships and applied consistently, ethically and fairly.

............more later.mary gerdt