Astronomy Picture of the Day

Thursday, May 1, 2014

Gaz updates...

gaz updates...

may day...

In no particular order

Stand with Harvard students...

Some opinions citizens sent to the newspaper...Addison Independent...

Opinion: Money is overriding motivation of pipeline proponents

Posted on April 28, 2014 |
By Janice Potter

Every day the writing on the wall becomes clearer. Through the actions — and inactions — of county and state officials, the proposed Phase II gas pipeline from Middlebury to International Paper in Ticonderoga, N.Y., seems less like a proposal than a fait accompli. Despite the enormous opposition to affected communities, the land, the lake and the people of Vermont seem likely to be sacrificed to a gas pipe — not for any so-called “public good” but to enrich two corporations: Vermont Gas and International Paper.
“There’s a lot of money at stake.” This refrain occurs often in Addison Independent quotations of officials about the gas pipeline proposal. It’s not that Vermont Gas is pining to serve Rutland. If so, the company would forge straight to Rutland as it had originally planned before the awful idea of drilling under Lake Champlain put dollar signs in their corporate eyes. There’s a lot of money at stake. For whom? Well might landowners in Cornwall and Shoreham ask. Well might the fish in Lake Champlain ask. But who cares for the public good of fishes? A lot of money is at stake.
A recent vote taken on the Phase II question by the Addison County Regional Planning Commission is especially frustrating and almost shameful. The commission passed a motion in favor of the pipeline, 15-11. According to this newspaper only days before the vote, just the reverse had been expected, and by a fairly comfortable margin. Now only four votes have changed everything providing the Public Service Board with an approval which is purported to represent county people as a whole. Hardly a landslide vote.
Legitimate questions about the vote arise. Why did several members of the ACRPC commission fail to show up for such an important vote? Why did Executive Director Adam Lougee seemingly pressure other members prior to the vote by announcing his personal opinion in favor of the pipeline? Why did the Audubon Society’s delegate to the ACRPC betray the explicit will of his own organization by voting in favor of the pipeline? The refrain recurs: There’s a lot of money at stake.
And no, that money is not about serving Addison County people with cheap energy. County folk will hardly get a whiff of that gas, at least until it leaks from under ground or lake. That money is not about restitution to landowners or taxes paid to help communities. Vermont Gas proposes to pay annually decreasing taxes. Soon it would pay no taxes — forever.
And no, that money is not about keeping International Paper in business so that John Doe can have his job, or at least not to have to compete with a bunch of jobless Yorker Does. Scare tactics are a gross form of public pressure. But, for the corporation, there’s a lot of profit at stake.
Every Vermonter and every New Yorker should rise up in protest at this threat to alter the bed of Lake Champlain. This is not only a local concern, but also a state and a national concern of the Environmental Protection Agency in terms of our natural resources and how to protect them. I wonder if anyone has even inquired of the Public Service Board: How would you like a giant machine to drill a livid gas pipe under your beds? Of course, you would have to believe in the life present in nature in order to sympathize with this question. Nevertheless we should not abjectly relinquish the lake to the corporations which have only one thought in their corporate heads.
Observing the dwindling numbers of passenger pigeons in New England, Henry David Thoreau made an analogy to the dwindling of serious thought in humans: “So, it would seem, few and fewer thoughts visit each growing man from year to year, for the grove in our minds is laid waste — sold to feed unnecessary fires of ambition, or sent to mill — and there is scarcely a twig left for them to perch on.”
Will the Public Service Board dwindle down to only one thought — there’s a lot of money at stake — when it rules on the “public good” of the Phase II proposal? Does the PSB read letters to the editor?
Janice Potter

Opinion: Adirondack Park held harmless at Vermont's expense

Posted on April 28, 2014 |
By Gary Murdock

As the Phase 2 pipeline controversy continues to swirl, it is important that everyone understand that we are being used by International Paper and the various government entities in New York to bypass their own homegrown obstacle to a natural gas line to the mill. That obstacle is their precious Adirondack Park.
As reported in the May 22, 2012, issue of the Post Star, IP and various New York commissions and municipalities have been working with their U.S. Rep. Bill Owens to bring gas to the plant long before the Vermont Gas option. But a quote in that story by Rep. Owens sums it all up: “We, obviously, have some issues bringing it down through the Adirondack Park.”
This is a battle that should be fought by New York, in New York. However it appears that we are looked at as less of an obstacle than their government. Now I understand the importance of IP to New York, but frankly all they contribute to us is depressed property values. We get all the pain with none of the gain. This is our one and only opportunity to get something of value out of this endeavor, and that is gas line distribution for us. Not the paltry little bones that Vermont Gas throws to us as opposition mounts, but gas line distribution throughout the area.
So while Vermont Gas officials are telling Ticonderoga town leaders that gas could be extended into other portions of their community, as reported in the Times of Ti on June 11, 2013, and threatening eminent domain procedures, it is important to remember that we are being used by IP and New York. IP and New York are choosing the path of least resistance, and protecting their Adirondack Park at our expense.
I wonder, is that what the framers of the Vermont state Constitution had in mind when drafting our eminent domain clause? The taking of Vermont land for the benefit of New York?
Gary Murdock

Link to website for water protection:

From the Times-Argus...
More of the legal muck that makes my hairs hurt to read:

Upcoming hearing: Notice from
Hi friends!
The permitting process for the second part of the fracked gas pipeline is just beginning and the Public Service Board has a new opportunity to stand with the public, deny Vermont Gas a certificate of public good, and stop this dirty and destructive pipeline.
This is our chance to tell the Public Service Board that a high-pressure fracked gas transmission pipeline under Lake Champlain - built entirely to serve an out of state corporation - is not in the public good for Vermont!

When: Wednesday, May 7th. Hearing starts at 7:00 pm, arrive early testimony sign up
Where: Shoreham Elementary School 130 School Rd Shoreham, VT
If you are planning to come and to stay updated please RSVP here:

Ok, I have had enough...
End with a 1 hour movie...somehow related to NPR...

Thanks for watching...sharing, caring.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Feel free to leave comments. Have a great day in the Universe!